Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant

Common questions

Is Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant healthy?

Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant scores 15/100 on Scout's independent analysis of ingredients, additives, and lab results — one of the lower scores in Scout's catalog. Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain scores 15/100.

How does Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant compare to other deodorant?

Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant ranks #56 of 59 deodorant in Scout's independent rankings. The current top score in the category is BASED Magnesium Deodorant (Santal) at 100/100.

Which ingredients drive Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant's score?

In Scout's ingredient-by-ingredient analysis, Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate, Cyclopentasiloxane, PPG-14 Butyl Ether are flagged as ingredients of concern. The full breakdown, with why each one matters, is in the Key ingredients section on this page.

Healthy alternatives

See more

Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain Antiperspirant

15 Poor

At a glance

Beneficial ingredients 0
Harmful ingredients 6
Category Deodorant
Summary

Degree Women UltraClear Refreshing Rain scores 15/100. The active is aluminum sesquichlorohydrate (lower aluminum percentage than tetrachlorohydrex versions but same sweat-duct-plugging mechanism and systemic-absorption concern). The base is the standard Unilever stack: cyclopentasiloxane (D5 silicone, EU vPvB-flagged), PPG-14 butyl ether (petrochemical), PEG-8 distearate (1,4-dioxane risk), BHT (endocrine flag), polyethylene microplastic in some variants, and synthetic fragrance with no allergen breakdown disclosed. The 'anti white marks / anti yellow stains' positioning is a clothing-care claim, not a skin/health benefit.

Key ingredients 11

Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate
Very Bad

Aluminum-based antiperspirant active. Lower aluminum percentage than tetrachlorohydrex variants but same plug-the-sweat-duct mechanism and systemic-absorption concern.

See more about Aluminum Sesquichlorohydrate →
Cyclopentasiloxane
Very Bad

Cyclic silicone classified by the EU's ECHA as vPvB (very persistent, very bioaccumulative). REACH-restricted in wash-off cosmetics since 2020 and listed under Canada's CEPA toxic substances. Aquatic-toxic.

See more about Cyclopentasiloxane →
Fragrance (Parfum)
Very Bad

Undisclosed proprietary blend that can legally contain 1000+ chemicals including phthalate carriers. Top trigger for cosmetic contact dermatitis.

See more about Fragrance (Parfum) →
PPG-14 Butyl Ether
Bad

Propylene glycol ether derived from petrochemical feedstocks. Skin penetration enhancer.

See more about PPG-14 Butyl Ether →
PEG-8 Distearate
Bad

Ethoxylated emulsifier carrying 1,4-dioxane contamination risk (a known carcinogen) as a manufacturing byproduct.

See more about PEG-8 Distearate →
BHT
Bad

Synthetic phenolic antioxidant flagged as a potential endocrine disruptor and skin sensitizer. Restricted in toys/childcare in the EU.

See more about BHT →
Stearyl Alcohol
Neutral

Fatty alcohol used as emollient/thickener. Considered safe.

See more about Stearyl Alcohol →
Hydrogenated Castor Oil
Neutral

Hydrogenated castor oil — plant-derived wax. Generally well-tolerated.

See more about Hydrogenated Castor Oil →
Silica
Neutral

Mineral absorbent. Inert.

See more about Silica →
Sodium Starch Octenylsuccinate
Neutral

Starch-derived absorbent. Inert; considered safe.

See more about Sodium Starch Octenylsuccinate →
Maltodextrin
Neutral

Starch-derived absorbent. Inert; considered safe.

See more about Maltodextrin →

Get the full breakdown in the Scout appTake Scout shopping

Scan any product to see lab results, healthy alternatives, and your personalized analysis.

Download on theApp Store GET IT ONGoogle Play