Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum

Common questions

Is Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum healthy?

Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum scores 12/100 on Scout's independent analysis of ingredients, additives, and lab results — one of the lower scores in Scout's catalog. Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum scores 12/100.

How does Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum compare to other fragrances?

Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum ranks #26 of 44 fragrances in Scout's independent rankings. The current top score in the category is Rosy & Earnest Be Earnest Eau de Parfum at 85/100.

Which ingredients drive Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum's score?

In Scout's ingredient-by-ingredient analysis, Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate (Tinogard TT) counts in its favor; Parfum (Fragrance), Limonene, Linalool are flagged as ingredients of concern. The full breakdown, with why each one matters, is in the Key ingredients section on this page.

Healthy alternatives

See more

Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum

12 Poor

At a glance

Beneficial ingredients 1
Harmful ingredients 15
Category Fragrances
Summary

Louis Vuitton Imagination Eau de Parfum scores 12/100. The flagship men's citrus-tea EDP carries TEN declared EU allergens — the most in the Louis Vuitton line — including cinnamal and isoeugenol, two of the most potent contact sensitizers IFRA regulates (isoeugenol is capped at 0.02% in leave-ons). Add the undisclosed 'Parfum' trade-secret core with no musk or phthalate exclusion pledges, avobenzone (photoallergenic UV filter protecting the pale-blue juice), and three synthetic dyes (Blue 1, Yellow 10, Ext. Violet 2) for a bottle-aesthetic tint that touches skin with every spray. The lone bright spot: Tinogard TT instead of BHT as the antioxidant — the same cleaner choice Dior makes in Sauvage. At $370 per 100ml, the formula grade matches a $70 designer bottle.

Key ingredients 18

Parfum (Fragrance)
Very Bad

Trade-secret blanket term that legally conceals dozens to hundreds of individual aromachemicals. For a high-projection LVMH designer scent the blend almost certainly contains synthetic polycyclic musks (Galaxolide, Tonalide) — endocrine disruptors that bioaccumulate in human fat tissue and breast milk — and LVMH discloses no phthalate-replacement policy for its solvent system.

See more about Parfum (Fragrance) →
Cinnamal
Very Bad

Cinnamon aldehyde — one of the most potent EU-declared contact allergens, with among the highest positive rates in fragrance patch-test series.

See more about Cinnamal →
Isoeugenol
Very Bad

One of the strongest regulated fragrance sensitizers — IFRA caps it at 0.02% in leave-on products because of its contact-allergy record.

See more about Isoeugenol →
Limonene
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product. Oxidizes on skin and in the bottle into stronger sensitizers.

See more about Limonene →
Linalool
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product. Air-oxidized linalool hydroperoxides are confirmed contact sensitizers.

See more about Linalool →
Citronellol
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product.

See more about Citronellol →
Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone)
Bad

Chemical UV filter (avobenzone) added to keep the tinted juice from discoloring in the clear bottle. Documented photoallergen with mild estrogenic activity in cell and animal studies — concerning in a leave-on product applied to the neck and wrists daily.

See more about Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone) →
Coumarin
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product. Category 2 skin sensitizer; the EU SCCS has flagged cumulative exposure risk across multiple fragranced products.

See more about Coumarin →
Citral
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product. IFRA restricts maximum use levels in leave-on products because of its high contact-allergy rate.

See more about Citral →
Geraniol
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product.

See more about Geraniol →
Farnesol
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product.

See more about Farnesol →
Eugenol
Bad

IFRA / EU-declared fragrance allergen; required on the label because it exceeds 0.001% in this leave-on product. Clove-derived sensitizer with a high patch-test positivity rate.

See more about Eugenol →
CI 42090 (FD&C Blue 1)
Bad

Coal-tar synthetic dye added purely for the pale-blue bottle aesthetic; a documented sensitizer class in topical products.

See more about CI 42090 (FD&C Blue 1) →
CI 47005 (Yellow 10)
Bad

Quinoline-class synthetic dye added for bottle aesthetics; restricted in some jurisdictions for topical use.

See more about CI 47005 (Yellow 10) →
CI 60730 (Ext. Violet 2)
Bad

Coal-tar synthetic dye added purely for bottle aesthetics; a documented skin sensitizer class in topical products.

See more about CI 60730 (Ext. Violet 2) →
Alcohol
Neutral

Ethanol solvent carrier (majority of formula). Drying to skin but otherwise inert.

See more about Alcohol →
Aqua (Water)
Neutral
Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate (Tinogard TT)
Good

Cleaner antioxidant alternative to BHT — the only meaningfully positive ingredient in the formula.

See more about Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate (Tinogard TT) →

Get the full breakdown in the Scout appTake Scout shopping

Scan any product to see lab results, healthy alternatives, and your personalized analysis.

Download on theApp Store GET IT ONGoogle Play