W3LL People

19 products in Scout's rankings · Updated October 2026 · How we score

Scout has scored 19 W3LL People products in its rankings. Scores run from 76 to 98 out of 100: 16 rate Excellent and 3 Good. The top score, 98/100, is shared by 9 products, among them W3LL People Dew Your Makeup Mist 3-in-1 Setting Spray (#14 of 87 in Makeup); the lowest is W3LL People Lush Lip Tinted Oil at 76/100. 16 are Scout's Picks (scored 88+).

At a glance

Excellent (85–100)16
Good (70–84)3
Fair (50–69)0
Poor (under 50)0
Scout's Picks (88+)16

W3LL People products, by Scout score

Ordered by Scout score. Each score compares a product with others in its own category; the line under each one says where it places there.

W3LL People products by category

CategoryProductsScoresBest rank
Makeup 15 80–98 #14 of 87
Lip Care 2 76–95 #10 of 33
Sunscreen 1 98 #12 of 58
Skin Care 1 89 #31 of 63

Ingredients Scout flags across W3LL People

Ingredients rated harmful in Scout's analyses that appear in at least two of these 19 products. Each link opens Scout's analysis of the ingredient.

Beneficial ingredients across W3LL People

Ingredients rated beneficial in Scout's analyses that appear in at least two of these 19 products.

Common questions about W3LL People

What is the highest-scoring W3LL People product?

9 products share the top score of 98/100: W3LL People Dew Your Makeup Mist 3-in-1 Setting Spray, W3LL People Expressionist Pro Mascara, W3LL People Expressionist Volumizing Mascara and 6 more.

What is the lowest-scoring W3LL People product?

W3LL People Lush Lip Tinted Oil, at 76/100 — #24 of 33 in Lip Care. Its product page lists the ingredients behind the score.

How does Scout score W3LL People products?

Each product gets its own 1–100 score, judged against other products in the same category with a category-specific framework: the full ingredient list, plus the published processing level, the packaging and any credible lab results where they apply. Scout does not score brands, and no brand pays for a score or a position.

Read the full methodology →